Poll: Vast majority of Americans believe Super PACs should be illegal
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll has found that 70 percent of registered voters believe that Super PACs should be illegal.
Sixty-nine percent of all Americans and voters alike say super PACs, a fundraising vehicle that allows wealthy donors to make unlimited donations in support of a particular candidate or party, should be banned. Just 25 percent said they should remain legal.
Those numbers were even more startling among political independents, 78 percent of whom say super PACs should be illegal.
The widespread disgust directed toward super PACs from voters comes amid a Republican presidential primary election season in which these organizations have played an outsized role.
The Post also reports that Restore Our Future has already spent about “$34 million in early presidential primary states” on Romney’s behalf. Almost a third of that primary spending was in Florida.
Despite the fact that Super PACs tend to bring in big money and can spend millions supporting or opposing political candidates, the groups are subject to very little regulation, as they were created in the wake of the federal court case known as SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission, which loosened up previous campaign finance regulations. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Super PACs “may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, then spend unlimited sums to overtly advocate for or against political candidates.” Thanks to new rules, Super PACs can receive unlimited amounts of money from corporations, which was previously illegal.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
Red Tent Bazaar Fundraiser for The Colorado Independent Wear red and join us for a night of drinks, music, dancing and laughter to benefit The […]Read More
It’s time to take another look at where gubernatorial donors are coming from— in terms of geography at least. We examined this topic last month, […]Read More