Littwin: And the freedom fighters roared

Littwin: And the freedom fighters roared

The crackup is coming. You don’t have to be a political genius to spot it. Everyone knew it was coming eventually. The only surprise is that the fault lines are moving so quickly.

The polls are in — and they say just what you’d expect. Most people are unhappy with the government shutdown, and, for the most part, they blame Republicans. This is a shock only to those Tea Party types who thought that if they could only force the government to shut down, they’d be greeted as liberators.

This all became clear to me at a recent Republican gubernatorial event when a speaker greeted the crowd by shouting into the microphone: “Welcome freedom fighters.”

The crowd roared. And when shutdown was mentioned, the SUV-driving freedom fighters — fresh off the exurban barricades — roared again. That’s where we are today. The freedom fighters have shut down the government, and they now may even force a default, fighting the battle to take the richest country in the world to deadbeat status. Circle the date on your calendar. We have until Oct. 17 to get this fixed.

And, if we don’t, then what happens?

I’m not talking about the economic catastrophe that nearly every economist predicts (even as one of your sharper Tea Party congressmen, Ted Yolo of Florida, says he thinks a default “would bring stability to world markets”). The catastrophe – which presumably ends before the cliff dive, because, well, it just has to — is one thing. I mean, what happens when the phony-baloney crisis is over?

That’s when the crisis in the Republican Party gets serious. You can already see the cracks. Either the Tea Party folks are actual freedom fighters or they’re obstructionists who don’t believe in compromise, particularly if the compromise means negotiating about Obamacare or, for that matter, Obama-anything. Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer has called the House Tea Partiers the “suicide caucus.” Conservative congressman Devin Nunes calls them the “lemming caucus.” You can pick your own cliff-diving metaphor. They all take you to the same place.

In normal times, a minority of one party in one house of Congress couldn’t wield so much power. But these are not normal times. In times when the real danger for Republicans in Congress is to be primaried from the right, Ted Cruz scares Speaker John Boehner into pretending to believe that Obama could actually be forced into defunding Obamacare. And, with Boehner’s speakership at stake, the suicide caucus lets Boehner know that compromise is out of the question.

These are times when, as National Review’s Robert Costa explained in an interview with the Washington Post, “many of these members now live in the conservative world of talk radio and tea party conventions and Fox News invitations. And so the conservative strategy of the moment, no matter how unrealistic it might be, catches fire.”

Rep. Nunes put it another way. He said that instead of taking on the “100-car pileup” that he called the Obamacare rollout, “we decided, with our small little part of government, to take our little bicycle into the path of the cars.”

The conventional wisdom was that Republicans wouldn’t come close to this bike-crushing point until after the 2016 presidential election. The scenario went something like this: The conservative purists finally nominate one of their own, but then he (Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, whoever) gets George McGoverned by Hillary Clinton. And like the post-McGovern Democrats, Republicans – who have moved so far to the right they’re falling off the page — would learn the same lesson and eventually edge back in the direction of the center. Voters don’t generally like extremes, and parties, when beaten often enough, learn that lesson. Republicans have lost the popular vote in five of the last six presidential elections, and one more would do the trick.

Of course, it may not turn out that way at all. We could get a President Cruz. But, in any case, everything has moved up now with the shutdown/possible default. And anyone who thinks the Tea Partiers will head to the center needs to think again. Read Costa’s quote. The would-be freedom fighters think they are revolutionaries. They hear their praises sung on talk radio, on Fox, in the right-wing blogosphere. The red-blue divide has gotten ever deeper, and backing down, for both sides, becomes ever more costly. A Time magazine cover story says Jim DeMint of the Heritage Foundation is running the Republican Party. On the pages of the New York Times, Wall Street wonders how it lost control, even as the Koch brothers fund the revolution. And both Cruz and Paul are legitimate contenders to lead the fight in 2016.

If you watched Boehner on ABC’s This Week, you saw it all play out in a 10-minute interview with George Stephanopoulos. Boehner conceded that he had made an agreement with Harry Reid months ago to pass a “clean” budget resolution out of the House if Reid agreed to the sequestration numbers. He then said he had to change his mind because of, you know, Obamacare. And now? Obama is the problem because he refuses to have a “conversation,” with him, although Boehner wouldn’t say what the “conversation” would be about because, at this point, there doesn’t seem to be a plan.

Finally, Boehner said the one thing we can all agree on: He has no idea how it’s going to end. What he didn’t say — but must be thinking — is that, however it ends, it can’t end well.

[ Freedom fighters by Maurice Sendak ]

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

Mike Littwin

He has covered Dr. J, four presidential inaugurations, six national conventions and countless brain-numbing speeches in the New Hampshire and Iowa snow.
mlittwin@coloradoindependent.com | Twitter @mike_littwin

5 Comments

  1. David Robinette on said:

    Let the right wingnuts have their fun. Sooner or later superior force will deal with them. It may come when the majority of the people tire of the fascism disguised as conservatism, and vote them out. Or it may require military intervention. If the latter, I sincerely hope no one repeats the biggest mistake of the 19th century, which was allowing them to return to the Union as states. Next time – territories, protectorates, anything but states.

  2. Lewis Greiner on said:

    Super article. I especially like the unfortunate but accurate metaphor “100-car pileup” which is sadly so true. I also agree with Mike’s premise in general, and the weird sort-of-Fringe-like
    alternative realities we all must combat in order to live “real” lives. I for one suggest more outdoor activities and less screen time. And perhaps some Dr. J dunk reruns when we are actually watching TV.

  3. Bonnie Wenngren on said:

    “Anger Can Be Power” by Thomas Edsall in today’s NYT gives an insightful if frightening glimpse into the minds of the Republican hard right voters, based on research for Democracy Corps. Evangelicals and Tea Partiers do believe they are fighting for the survival of their (and therefore as it was meant to be) world; thus, they justify the potential havoc they create. They “are not ready” for — a euphemism for intellectually/culturally incapable of adapting to — the 21st century that seems to reject not only the values but the very meaning of their lives, so the risk of reducing that 21st century world to rubble does not deter them.
    But on the positive side: How nice to see Mike Littwin’s work again!

  4. Tom Morris on said:

    The future rests on the sanity of those “marginal” Republicans who will vote for a Clean Bill. If Boehner can’t come up with a clean bill, they should switch parties and elect Pelosi Speaker. The GOP cannot endure as a “tail” wagged dog.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>