Capitol Dispatch: Let’s debate this bill, on Snapchat
What kind of official communication falls under Colorado’s open records laws?
DENVER — Lawmakers here Monday affably wrestled with open-records riddles in the Senate Judiciary Committee on the way to killing a bill that all the committee members nevertheless thought raised important questions.
Like this one: If three clerks huddle together in a room, does the public have a right to know what they talk about? What about three sheriffs — or 55 who want to sue the state? On these questions, the committee pretty much agreed that, well, no, the public doesn’t have a right to know — at least as the law stands now.
The reason has to do with a lack of overlap between Colorado’s Sunshine Law and its Open Records Act. It’s a little wonky but if you’re curious, committee member Mike Johnston, a Democratic Senator from Denver, gives a solid 90-second explanation here.
The bill, SB 70, was sponsored by Kevin Lundberg, a Loveland Republican who is also a Judiciary Committee member and was the only one to vote for the measure. He said the vibrant committee debate over his bill was encouraging in a session already marked by partisan tension.
The bill got legislators talking, and laughing, about Colorado’s fairly rusty open records laws.
[Snapchat still from Jessica B.]
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
Red Tent Bazaar Fundraiser for The Colorado Independent Wear red and join us for a night of drinks, music, dancing and laughter to benefit The […]Read More
It’s time to take another look at where gubernatorial donors are coming from— in terms of geography at least. We examined this topic last month, […]Read More