Fair and Unbalanced
Cory Gardner realizes personhood bad for at least one person (yeah, him)
To the surprise of no one, Cory Gardner has had an epiphany that “personhood” — which he has either strongly supported or really, really strongly supported since at least 2008 — is a bad idea, particularly if you’re running for the U.S. Senate.
In the classic Friday afternoon news dump, Gardner told ace reporter Lynn Bartels that, at some undisclosed point, he changed his mind, finally figuring out what everyone had been saying for years — that “personhood” doesn’t allow for certain kinds of oft-used contraception. And now that he’s figured out what he could have figured out if he had bothered to read the amendment or any story written about the amendment, he says he “can’t support that going forward.”
Let’s be honest (we can start with you, Cory), he had no choice here. Gardner knows he had to take his medicine and try to get it out of the way early. This is a non-starter, after all. Twice “personhood” has gone before Colorado voters, and each time it has lost by a 3-to-1 count. Gardner says the people have spoken, but, by my count, they spoke about four years ago – and Gardner didn’t say anything about it until he entered the Senate race against Mark Udall.
Because, Gardner says, he’s willing to listen – presumably to his campaign people. At other points in his life, he happily, and publicly, passed out petitions for “personhood” at his church, just to show how fundamental this principle was for him.
He’ll be asked about the timeline. Because, as the Udall campaign points out, it’s hard to pin down the exact moment of Gardner’s change of heart. For the last two years in the House, Gardner was a co-sponsor of the Life Begins at Conception Act, which is pretty much the federal version of “personhood,” because it says, well, that life begins at conception, which, it seems to me, is the whole point of “personhood.”
Here’s an educated guess: We can figure that the very moment Gardner conceived of entering the Senate race was also the very moment the idea of dumping “personhood” was born.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
Editor Susan Green, Laura Carno, Kelly Maher and Laura Chapin dissect the much-discussed War on Women amidst a Colorado campaign season almost exclusively focused on women’s issues, but in which little policy has been discussed and few women’s voices heard.Read More
We all know what a blanket of fresh snow is supposed to look like, but for the last 10 years, the snows falling in parts of the Colorado Rockies have been far from virgin white and fluffy.Read More
Does fear mongering like this really work?Read More