Delete child victims’ names from police records, lawmakers say
The names of children who are victims of serious crimes should be deleted from criminal justice records before those records are released to the public, a panel of state lawmakers decided Wednesday.
SB 16-110 cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee on a 5-0 vote and was placed on the Senate’s consent calendar, which is reserved for non-controversial measures.
Sen. Laura Woods, R-Arvada, explains SB 16-110.
“Victims who are children are further victimized when their name is made public, when their neighbors, their friends at school, their community find out about whatever has happened to them,” said Sen. Laura Woods, R-Arvada, the bill’s sponsor. “Children tend to be very sensitive about their reputations.”
The Colorado Criminal Justice Records Act already requires the deletion of sexual assault victims’ names prior to the release of those records. Child abuse records are confidential under a separate statute.
The names of other child victims may still appear in criminal justice records, although such names typically are not reported in the news media. The Society of Professional Journalists’ code of ethics says that journalists should “use heightened sensitivity when dealing with juveniles, victims of sex crimes, and sources or subjects who are inexperienced or unable to give consent.”
SB 16-110 covers some of the most serious crimes against children. Among them: Internet sexual exploitation of a child, enticement of a child, Internet luring of a child, soliciting for child prostitution and human trafficking of a minor for involuntary servitude.
In addition to deleting the names, a criminal justice agency would be required to write “CHILD VICTIM” on any record of official action that involves a child victim.
“Everybody is surprised that the law currently does not protect children who are victims of very serious offenses from having their identities publicly disclosed,” said Deputy Attorney General Melody Mirbaba. She said the legislature never clearly stated this in the statutes, although it’s mentioned in the legislative declarations of some laws.
“Juveniles who perpetrate crimes generally are afforded more protection of their identifying information,” Mirbaba said.
Visit CFOIC’s legislature page to track bills in the General Assembly that could affect the flow or availability of information in Colorado.
Photo: Sen. Laura Wood, R-Arvada, explains SB 16-110
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
The Colorado Criminal Defense Bar (CCDB) and the Community College of Denver (CCD) Paralegal Program are holding a public debate for the candidates seeking the position […]Read More
Republicans running for Colorado governor would— and wouldn’t— ban bump stocks, and one of them gets out front on gun violence
Amid a gun policy debate gripping the nation in the wake of multiple mass shootings, one illuminating aspect can be found in the Republican primary […]Read More