Hickenlooper vetoes red-light camera bill 2nd year in a row

Hickenlooper vetoes red-light camera bill 2nd year in a row


Gov. John Hickenlooper Thursday struck down, for the second year in a row, a bill that would strip red-light cameras off of most city streets statewide.

The proposal, House Bill 16-1231, would have allowed the use of red-light cameras only in specific areas, such as school zones and streets undergoing construction or repair.

Hickenlooper reminded lawmakers that he had vetoed two similar bills last year, with the admonition that the use of red-light cameras should be limited and “used only in a manner that instills trust in government and confidence that public safety is paramount.”

However, he continued, HB 1321 had no such reasonable limitations. Instead, the bill sets up a state-imposed “blanket ban on red light cameras for all municipalities, denying communities the right to decide for themselves based on their own traffic safety needs.”

Hickenlooper earned kudos from the Traffic Safety Coalition, which had opposed the proposal, along with most of the state’s largest municipalities and police chiefs.

In a statement, the coalition’s co-chairs, Paul and Sue Oberhauser, thanked the governor for rejecting the proposal, adding that “red light running is an often deadly epidemic, and indisputable data shows traffic safety cameras reduce red light running, crashes and save lives.” The Oberhauser’s daughter was killed by a motorist who ran a red light.

The bill passed the House in March 3 on a slim 33-31 vote, and in the Senate later that month on a 23-12 vote. Both votes were bipartisan, as was the bill’s sponsorship.

“This isn’t a partisan issue,” said conservative pundit Jonathan Lockwood of Advancing Colorado.

“We know that red light camera companies are notorious for bribing politicians,” Lockwood said. “It seems to me nobody likes [the cameras] unless they make money off of them…it’s just one more tool in the toolbox of big government to take people’s money.”

Lockwood is referring to a KMGH investigation last year that revealed the former CEO of Redflex Traffic Systems had pleaded guilty to bribery in Ohio. That executive, Karen Finley, has since pleaded guilty to a $2 million bribery scheme in Illinois.

Redflex has installed red light cameras in at least two Colorado cities: Denver and Fort Collins. And a former vice president of Redflex alleged Colorado officials had also taken bribes from the company. The official did not name names. 

Denver has since contracted with a different company for its red light cameras, according to KMGH.


Photo credit: Emertz76, Creative Commons, Flickr

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

About the Author

Marianne Goodland

has been a political journalist since 1998. She covered the state capitol for the Silver & Gold Record from 1998 to 2009 and for The Colorado Statesman in 2010-11 and 2013-14. Since 2010 she also has covered the General Assembly for newspapers in northeastern Colorado. She was recognized with awards from the Colorado Press Association for feature writing and informational graphics for her work with the Statesman in 2012.


  1. buford on said:

    so…local communities can set their own traffic laws, but we cannot decide on Fracking? ummm…Frankenlooper is a turd…

  2. ScottG on said:

    Ever watched a red-light camera intersection? Fed DOT “standard” yellow light is 4 seconds- RLC intersections are 3 seconds. Anyone else see a problem here?

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>