TABOR lawsuit is back, stronger than ever
After suffering a major setback earlier this year, the legal team trying to repeal Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights amendment is back and charging once again into the breach.
Better known as TABOR, the amendment limits state spending and prohibits tax increases without a vote of the people. It has been panned by many lawmakers and policy analysts, and some point to it as a reason why Colorado lags in education funding nationally. Still, supporters believe it is a venerable effort at direct democracy.
In 2011, a group of public officials filed a lawsuit against the 1992 TABOR amendment, which puts an annual cap on the state’s tax revenue, on the grounds that it is unconstitutional. The case is officially filed against Governor Hickenlooper, who as head of state represents the Colorado Constitution. In the intervening five years, the case’s legitimacy has been, at different turns, supported, disputed and ultimately denied.
In 2013, two years after the case was filed, the Tenth Circuit approved it, heard it and handed down a decision in favor of the plaintiffs in 2014. But Colorado’s then-Attorney General, John Suthers, challenged that decision, arguing that the plaintiffs did not in fact qualify to be heard. The Supreme Court sided with Suthers and issued an order for the Tenth Circuit to reconsider the case in light of a recent decision, Arizona Legislature v. Arizona Redistricting Commission, that mandated that plaintiffs in this kind of case must be composed of complete government bodies, not just individuals.
The court decided that the case’s legal team was not qualified to file a lawsuit because, though the plaintiffs were all legislators whose work had been impacted by TABOR’s restrictions, the court had decided that only whole governmental bodies had the right to sue.
That led the Tenth Circuit to the decision it made in July — that the TABOR challenge was inadequate and had to re-evaluate.
Accordingly, on Tuesday the legal team added county commissions, school boards and special district boards to its list of plaintiffs.
“We are now feeling much better about standing,” attorney David Skaggs told The Independent.
All of the listed plaintiffs are public officials, and many of the new additions are government entities that have been impacted by TABOR spending limits, mostly through reduced funding from the state.
Attorney General Cynthia Coffman now has 60 days to file a motion to dismiss the case, as Suthers did. Legal team spokespeople said they cautiously predict that she will do so.
Photo Credit: Matthew Cepican, Creative Commons, Flickr
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
The Colorado Criminal Defense Bar (CCDB) and the Community College of Denver (CCD) Paralegal Program are holding a public debate for the candidates seeking the position […]Read More
A candidate’s secret spending in the governor’s race highlights Colorado’s unique money-in-politics enforcement laws
Erik Underwood, a Democrat running in the wide race for governor, is drawing attention for his secret spending on the race. The media tech entrepreneur […]Read More