BLM’s planned lease sale of 100,000 Colorado acres for drilling prompts legal protest

BLM’s planned lease sale of 100,000 Colorado acres for drilling prompts legal protest

The Bureau of Land Management’s proposal to auction approximately 100,000 acres of federal public lands in northern Colorado for oil and gas drilling has attracted legal pushback from conservation groups, who say the “massive” lease sale threatens some of Colorado’s most treasured and scenic landscapes and wildlife species.

Fracking these pristine public lands would come at the cost of imperiled wildlife, clean air and clean water, meanwhile worsening climate change,” says Michael Saul, senior attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity.

The Center has joined environmental groups Sierra Club, Living Rivers and the Waterkeeper Alliance in filing an administrative protest against the proposed sale, scheduled for Jun 9. The 30-day public protest period has now ended.

BLM Colorado conducts such lease sales quarterly, as required by the Mineral Leasing Act. In the most recent Colorado sale, in March, 17 parcels totaling 16,447 acres sold for an average of just over $5.50 per acre. The June sale, as has become standard for BLM lease sales, will be conducted online. Maps detailing the locations of the 106 parcels  are available here.

In their complaint, the conservation groups allege that the BLM acknowledged but did not address myriad public comments expressing concern about the proposed sale. They say that the increased drilling activity, particularly horizontal drilling and fracking, will pull water from the Colorado River system and thus increase water scarcity and stress.

The groups also have several complaints with the BLM’s environmental assessment, including that that its carbon budget analysis is inaccurate and that it fails to analyze significant impacts to wildlife, particularly to sensitive species.

“This massive plan, casually dismissed by the BLM as having ‘no significant environmental impact,’ will harm a host of sensitive and listed species including Colorado River and greenback cutthroat trout, greater sage grouse, Canada lynx, black-footed ferrets, white-tailed prairie dogs, rare wildflowers, deer, elk and moose,” the groups wrote in a statement.

BLM Colorado says it appreciates the input it receives from the public, but would not comment on specific complaints.

According to its website, lease sales are only the first step towards increased drilling. “Additional planning, environmental analysis and public input must occur before drilling can begin. If drilling occurs, every lease will require reclamation and contain standard terms and stipulations designed to protect air, water, wildlife, and historic and cultural resources,” the site says.

Attorney Michael Saul says that one of the most worrying aspects of the upcoming sale is that it will allow oil and gas leasing in Grand County, which has not yet seen substantial drilling.

 

UPDATE: The headline of this story has been updated to clarify that the BLM is holding a lease sale, not selling these acres directly. 

Photo via Bureau of Land Management Colorado

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

Kelsey Ray

7 Comments

  1. buford on said:

    this is Kochs’ plan, Frackenlooper’s plan, the big oil and gas folks pushing us around once again…BLM has been poisoned by lobbyists, and dark money interests…This must not happen…

  2. Luci on said:

    I find this headline misleading. BLM is selling leases for the land. They are not selling the land itself.

  3. Nanci on said:

    We the people should buy on the land (through the Wilderness Society or Sierra Club?) I get very distressed that our public lands are being destroyed, and that there is no care for wilderness and the environment in general. We are raping the land and leaving desolation to our children.

  4. Hortigue on said:

    Est il possible que nous les protecteurs que nous puissions nous regrouper autour d’un avocat est récolté suffisamment d’argent pour acheter ses baux?

  5. Sharon Paddock on said:

    Ownership or lease does not matter! Either sake our least it is giving rights to big oil to destroy another parcel of nature. Please don’t sell out our BLM lands for rich corporations to make big profits.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>