Drilling, one mile outside Colorado’s Great Sand Dunes

Drilling, one mile outside Colorado’s Great Sand Dunes

Since President Donald Trump was sworn into office last year, the administration has used its “energy dominance” agenda to require states to conduct quarterly sales on public lands across the West. As a result, the Bureau of Land Management is on track to double the acreage open for leasing in 2018, compared to 2017, in six Western states.

This September, 11 parcels totaling 18,358 acres located less than a mile from Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve in south-central Colorado will be up for an online auction, adding to the Interior Department’s growing quota.

The park is famous for its iconic sand dunes and has a reputation for being one of the quietest national parks in the country, according to a soundscape study conducted in 2008. Environmental groups worry that oil and gas drilling would significantly impact that silence, along with local wildlife and nearby wilderness. The growing number of visitors to the area will also be affected.

Though the lease sale is located just on the other side of the summit of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, which forms the preserve’s eastern boundary, it would push into previously undeveloped areas that provide important wildlife habitat. Some of the parcels are also near the Sangre de Cristo Wilderness Area and overlap the migratory corridors of elk herds and bighorn sheep, said Rebecca Fischer, a spokeswoman for WildEarth Guardians. Because the park is protected, it’s become an attractive place for wildlife to congregate, both inside and outside its boundaries. “The parcels are in an area where there hasn’t been any kind of oil and gas production before,” said Kimberly Pope, a Sierra Club spokeswoman. “It is a brand-new area with unknown resource availability that just doesn’t seem like a great choice for the BLM to be leasing.”

Hover over the map to see more information. The red indicates where the leasing parcels are, the blue outlines the Sangre De Cristo Wilderness area, and the green shows the Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve.

The greenhouse gases and other pollutants released by oil and gas drilling and development could harm the area’s air quality. According to the BLM’s draft environmental assessment, however, analysis on air quality effects will not be done until after a lease sale, when the land is being prepped for drilling. While this is a common practice for environmental assessments, it carries more weight in this case because the national park, like most in the country, has an “airshed” that is protected by the federal Clean Air Act. Other concerns include light pollution — the park is famous for its dark night skies — and the haze and noise caused by increased truck traffic to well sites.

Critics also contend that the BLM relied on outdated scientific information to complete its environmental assessment. The analysis was based on two resource management plans, which function as guides for land managers who need to balance development of different resources on public lands. The most recent was amended in 2009, and both are undergoing updates. The main concern is that the old plans do not take into account the local impacts of fracking technology, said Philip A. Francis Jr., chair of the Coalition to Protect America’s National Parks, in a written comment submitted to the BLM. A group of environmental organizations noted in their comment letter that the advances in fracking technology have made it possible to drill in areas that were previously inaccessible to standard drilling operations, making more public lands vulnerable to its impacts.

In addition to environmental impacts, 70 acres of at least one of the lease parcels overlap with a ranch purchased by the Navajo Nation in October 2017. The tribe bought the land due to its proximity to Blanca Peak, an important place to the Navajo Nation. While several other tribes were consulted by the BLM during the environmental assessment, the Navajo Nation was not, said Jayson Barangan, lead public affairs specialist from the BLM’s Colorado office. Barangan said the BLM is currently working with the tribe regarding potential development.

The BLM office has received over 4,000 public comments, which will be reviewed prior to finalizing the environmental assessment, said Barangan. The lease sale will be announced on July 20, and take place in September.

 

This story was originally published on High Country News by Jessica Kutz on April 13, 2018. High Country News is a nonprofit 501(c)3 independent media organization that covers the important issues and stories that define the American West
Photo Credit: National Park Service. Interactive Map Credit: Center for Western Priorities

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

Jessica Kutz, High Country News

2 Comments

  1. Will Morrison on said:

    For all those losers who want to tell you that the republicans and the democrats are all the same, there’s no difference, tell me that democrats would have done this. Because I call the lie to that. Democrats have SOME sense of what’s important, and when there are other ways around things that drilling on ever free parcel of land in this country to do this is just foolish. Which is how you KNOW it’s a republican plan.

    Kiss off every place you’ve been and appreciated for it’s natural beauty, because that means NOTHING to this crowd. It’s profits ALONE that matter. And so the majority gets to kiss off it’s heritage and it’s very bedrock to the profits of the very few. These vermin won’t leave ANYTHING alone.

    Why aren’t there a hundred letters here about this? Do people care THAT LITTLE about our natural resources and our parks system? This was a gift we gave to ourselves a hundred years ago, why are we IGNORING it’s destruction now? Is there just NO information going out about it, or do people just not care, anymore? This incenses me, both the action and the apathy towards it.

  2. Suzanne James on said:

    Like the responder above, I can’t believe how little public outcry there has been over this. People are so complacent, wrapped up in their own small world until it hits them in the face. Then they will wonder why the air around the sand dunes suddenly smelly of oil and sour gas, the roads are in worse shape than ever, traffic is now clogged with trucks and gazing at the Milky Way at night is a dream the past.
    And it is indeed the Republican Party who is to blame. I was raised Republican but even my staunch old grandfather came to recognize that with Reagan the face of the Republican Party began to change.
    Look at Oklahoma and Texas–both states are in deplorable condition as far as taking care of their people and yet they are both oil rich and give huge write off concessions to oil companies.
    COLORADOANS SHOULD BE FIGHTING FOR THE SAND DUNES WITH THEIR EVERY BREATH!

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>