Xcel Energy lops nearly $44 million off rate-increase request

Xcel Energy Thursday filed for state approval of a settlement with consumer groups in its ongoing rate case before the Colorado Public Utilities Commission (PUC), knocking nearly $44 million from its rate-increase request.

In a settlement with Energy Outreach Colorado and the Colorado Energy Consumers, Xcel agreed to only seek an annual electric rate increase of $136 million, mostly to cover more than $1.7 billion the company invested in the new Comanche 3 coal-fired power plant near Pueblo, two new gas-fired power plants at Fort St. Vrain, a smart-grid project in Boulder and other power line and distribution expenses.

coal plant

If approved by the PUC at final deliberations set for Dec. 3, the average residential customer will see an increase of $4.66 a month beginning Jan. 1, and small business customers will see an increase of $7.16 a month. Xcel had originally sought a nearly $180 million increase, which would have upped typical residential rates by nearly $5 a month.

This settlement is similar one last summer when Xcel reduced its rate-increase request from nearly $160 million to $112 million, but critics at the time claimed even that amount was too much given the company’s ill-advised investment in coal, which may spike in price if the Obama administration successfully pushes through climate change legislation.

Xcel, however, defends the state-of-the-art Comanche 3 project, which is set to come on line by the end of the year.

“We see this as a significant step to continuing our ability to provide reliable, reasonably priced electric service,” said Tim Taylor, CEO of Public Service Co. of Colorado, an Xcel Energy company. “Comanche 3 is a great investment for customers. Being able to use low-cost coal to provide base-load power is important for our Colorado customers. It also allows us to take the next step and begin retiring some of our older, less efficient coal-fired power plants to continue reducing our carbon dioxide emissions.”

Xcel has also taken heat for trying to pass on questionable travel and entertainment expenses to ratepayers – a move it quickly backpedaled on when consumer groups brought the charges to the attention of the PUC.

Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

David O. Williams

is an award-winning reporter who has covered energy, environmental and political issues for years. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Denver Post. He's founder of Real Vail
and Real Aspen.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>