Budget hawks bafflingly idealize big spender Reagan
This morning, Texas Rep. Kevin Brady, senior House Republican on the Joint Economic Committee, wondered aloud why Democrats faced with the recent recession didn’t adopt the same policies favored by Ronald Reagan during the economic downturn nearly 30 years ago.
“President Reagan pursued pro-growth policies, including large reductions in marginal tax rates, deregulation and open trade,” Brady said, arguing that those moves “laid the foundation for two decades of prosperity.”
In contrast, Brady continued, the Obama White House has tackled the current crisis by relying largely on deficit spending — a strategy Brady called “reckless” and “clearly unsustainable.”
“Unless these excessive spending deficits and debt accumulation are quickly reversed, the United States may experience its own debt crisis,” Brady said. He was warning that the U.S. is en route to becoming the next Greece.
What is Brady talking about?
When Reagan was elected to the White House in 1980, the federal debt stood at roughly $908 billion. Eight years and several tax cuts later, it was $2.6 trillion — a leap of 186 percent.
Put another way: Reagan racked up more debt in eight years than the previous seven presidents had managed in 35 — a span that included the Korean and Vietnam wars.
Some conservatives get this. Earlier this year, Libertarian Party Executive Director Wes Benedict noted that Reagan ran “the biggest-spending administration (as a percentage of GDP) since World War II.”
Why he remains a conservative icon, despite that track record, is a mystery.
Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
Red Tent Bazaar Fundraiser for The Colorado Independent Wear red and join us for a night of drinks, music, dancing and laughter to benefit The […]Read More
It’s time to take another look at where gubernatorial donors are coming from— in terms of geography at least. We examined this topic last month, […]Read More