Boating bill swamped by controversy, may lead to summer of river conflict
A controversial commercial rafting bill – one of the most contentious issues of the just-completed legislative session – sank in choppy waters this week, launching an almost certain push for a citizen-driven ballot measure or two and giving rise to dozens of cliché boating analogies in the mainstream media.
The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel Wednesday reported no fewer than 16 pending measures backed by landowner groups looking to bar commercial rafting outfits from navigating public rivers flowing through their land and four pending measures aimed at opening private land to access in the event of boating emergencies.
Rep. Kathleen Curry, I-Gunnison, plunged into deep and very hot water in January when she sought to resolve a dispute between a Texas landowner and two commercial rafting outfits along the Taylor River in her district. The landowner shut down rafting through the property despite years of established and safe commercial rafting.
An uneasy truce has existed for years, allowing boaters to navigate rivers through private land and go ashore in the event of an emergency or the need to portage (go around an obstacle in the river). Generally, landowners have looked the other way as long as boaters didn’t abuse the situation by pulling out for lunch or to camp.
Curry’s bill awakened the wrath of deep-pocketed and powerful landowner groups seeking to keep boaters off their property altogether. They feared the bill could be interpreted in favor of rafting outfitters in future court rulings, exposing them to liability.
Now things could get ugly this summer, Curry worries, prompting a return to the bad-old days when property owners in places like Eagle County and elsewhere were known to string barbed wire and throw rocks at rafters and some boaters cut fences and took other extreme measures to keep rivers free and open to the public.
“The tensions are really high because we didn’t get this thing resolved,” Curry told the Sentinel. “Folks will have a chance to vote on the issue in general terms, but it doesn’t answer a lot of the on-the-ground details. The guns are out, and the wires are being cut, and the fight is on back home.”
Gov. Bill Ritter today at a press conference in Denver wrapping up the legislative session, promised to work with groups to find some consensus.
“I think that there is still a need for the outfitting community, the rafting community and the landowners to find a way to sit down at a table and agree on how manage this resource,” Ritter said. “And I am going to convene the parties in the very near future and start having a discussion.
“My hope quite frankly at the end of the day is that this does not go to the ballot. Our rivers are a great national resources for the state. The landowners have a stake in the conversation, a significant stake in the situation. We think that there is a path forward and we are going to work on that this summer.”
Got a tip? Freelance story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
News junkies in Colorado are embroiled in a fierce debate over how best to save The Denver Post from its vampiric owners – the hedge […]Read More
The Home Front: A legal challenge to Boulder’s ‘ban on assault weapons’ hits 24 hours after it was voted into law
“Cody Wisniewski made good on his threat Tuesday night to sue Boulder and its council, mounting a legal challenge to the city’s ban on assault […]Read More