Phone survey results on gas drilling fly in face of Maes, Tancredo

Poll after poll, survey after survey, Coloradans continue to say they have serious reservations about the “drill, baby, drill” method of economic recovery. But still, Republicans and former Republicans on third-party tickets continue to run on regulation-roll-back platforms.

Oil and gas drilling near the Roan Plateau. (Photo/Ecoflight.info)

“Our economy equals energy in this state to start with,” GOP gubernatorial candidate Dan Maes said last week. “We have to undo the energy regulations. We have to get our natural gas out of the ground, our oil out of the ground, our coal out of the ground, our uranium out of the ground, and as those energy jobs comes back around it filters down into the secondary and tertiary jobs.”

Former Republican and current American Constitution Party gubernatorial candidate Tom Tancredo said last month, “There are no jobs in the green economy. There are plenty of jobs in taking oil and gas out of the ground.”

Denver mayor and Democratic candidate for governor John Hickenlooper, a former geologist who was laid off in the 80s and went into the restaurant business, says he would tweak a couple of the new, more environmentally friendly drilling regulations that went into effect last year, but that he by no means favors a complete overhaul.

A new survey reluctantly released last week from the heart of the state’s natural gas patch in Garfield County indicates Hickenlooper is more in step with local sentiment than either Maes or Tancredo.

Conducted on behalf of the educational health-care nonprofit Western Colorado Area Health Education Center (WCAHEC), the phone survey of 2,300 Garfield County residents found the majority had serious concerns about the environmental and public health impacts of natural gas drilling in the area.

Fully 68.5 percent of those surveyed said they were either somewhat concerned or very concerned about their air quality as the result of natural gas drilling; 72.4 percent felt the same way about water quality; and 68.1 percent were somewhat or very concerned about the traffic impacts of the oil and gas industry.

The phone survey had sparked some intrigue in the most heavily drilled county in the state leading up to a critical county commissioner election and the finalizing of a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) conducted by the Colorado School of Public Health in Battlement Mesa on behalf of the county.

There was some concern the poll was being conducted by the industry in an effort to undermine or delay the HIA, but it turns out the $12,000 WCAHEC survey was funded by a nonprofit environmental group called the Western Conservation Foundation.

WCAHEC Executive Director Carol Giffin-Jeansonne stressed in her cover letter releasing the survey last week and in an awkward teleconference with reporters that the poll “was not a scientific study, and from my view, has not the substance to make it worthy of news time.”

Giffin-Jeansonne intends to use the information to see if her organization can work with Garfield County public health officials to better educate area residents about the potential health risks of natural gas drilling. She expressed surprise on a call with reporters that the survey would in any way be politicized, despite the fact energy production has been a key campaign issue all year.

“We believe strongly that energy development is an important component of our economy and communities in much of western Colorado and neither I nor Western AHEC has any desire to use this as some kind of instrument that portrays the oil and gas industry in a negative way,” Giffin-Jeansonne said, adding she has personal history, however, with the industry.

“I raised my children in New Orleans area, where oil and gas is the only key industry other than tourism, and I also know what occurs because there wasn’t an open and honest discussion about any health care impacts on the community,” she said.

Asked if she didn’t want to be construed as an enemy of the industry, whether that meant she was a friend of the industry, Giffin-Jeansonne said that depended on what was meant by “friend.”

“I consider them to be a friend in the sense that what they do benefits not only the economy but they also provide a needed resource,” Giffin-Jeansonne said. “Now in my fantasy life one day we’ll run our cars on water and water will always be plentiful. That is not the case. The case is that we are dependent on oil and gas for our vehicles, for heating our homes, and I see no profit to making them out as the bad guys.”

The recent phone survey, conducted in early October, produced results similar to previous polls in Garfield County and across the Western Slope.

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

David O. Williams

is an award-winning reporter who has covered energy, environmental and political issues for years. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Denver Post. He's founder of Real Vail
and Real Aspen.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>