Feds Not Happy With Amendment 44
If you followed the Amendment 44 campaign last week, you might have walked away with the uncanny feeling that the only people who cared about the issue belonged to the federal government.
Three officials with the Office For National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) have traveled to Colorado recently, and each individual has not missed a chance to speak out against the amendment, which would legalize possession of an ounce of marijuana for adults. As this author reports in the Rocky Mountain Chronicle this week:
A day after Walters’ visit to the Springs, ONDCP Deputy Director Scott Burns followed up on the message when he joined Colorado Attorney General John Suthers and other law enforcement officials in speaking out against the amendment at the Regional Meth Conference held in Grand Junction.
At another summit focusing on meth last Monday in Loveland, a third ONDCP official, John Horton, spoke out against Amendment 44, linking it to the deadly drug.
But whatever the ONDCP’s plans are, there are at least no physical records on the Colorado ballot issue.
In response to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking information on Amendment 44 and federal involvement, the ONDCP has denied it has any records on the issue after an “extensive search.”
The request was submitted in September after another federal agency, the DEA, was in the midst of controversy over an alleged e-mail seeking help to defeat the amendment.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
SIGN UP FOR OUR WEEKLY NEWSLETTER
On April 21st, thousands of Coloradans and a diverse collection of leaders will come together to celebrate Earth Day with the Sierra Club. Together, Coloradans […]Read More
By now you’ve likely heard about The Denver Post’s multi-page editorial broadside at its hedge-fund owner. This week’s newsletter seeks to explain the local and national repercussions of […]Read More