Montana marijuana wars are just beginning, advocates vow

Montana marijuana wars are just beginning, advocates vow

In Montana, medical marijuana advocates say the passage of legislation which would all but outlaw medical marijuana in the state is merely the beginning of the battle.

From The Billings Gazette:

Medical marijuana advocates are launching a three-pronged strategy — veto, sue and suspend — to stop the recently passed bill that would impose far greater restrictions on the industry and make it harder for people to qualify for medical pot use.

First, they are trying to convince Gov. Brian Schweitzer to change his mind and veto Senate Bill 423, by Sen. Jeff Essmann, R-Billings. Schweitzer said Friday he wouldn’t veto the bill, but instead would hold his nose and let it become law without his signature. It has not become law yet.

The groups also may file lawsuits to challenge the future law, which would put medical marijuana growers and caregivers out of business by July 1.

Finally, they want to stop the law in its tracks by mounting a referendum to suspend it before it takes effect and let voters decide its fate on the November 2012 ballot.

Jim Gingery, executive director of the Montana Medical Growers Association, told the Colorado Independent that his organization and others are not about to give up. He said he is still hopeful that Schweitzer will veto the bill, if only to block a resurgent black market for marijuana.

Schweitzer, though, says vetoing the bill would be pointless as the Legislature has more than enough votes to override any veto.

Gingery acknowledges that the most likely scenario will be for the reforms to become law and for the issue to go back to voters, who approved legalizing medical marijuana by a nearly two-thirds majority. He says he expects even greater support if voters are asked to weigh in again.

That process, however, could leave Montana in a state of near-prohibition from July of this year until November 2012, when a new governor will also be selected.

Supporters say, though, that if there is no veto they will work to get the new law suspended until voters can weigh in.

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

Scot Kersgaard

Scot Kersgaard has been managing editor of a political newspaper, editor and co-owner of a ski town newspaper, executive editor of eight high-tech magazines (where he worked with current Apple CEO Tim Cook), deputy press secretary to a U.S. Senator, and an outdoors columnist at the Rocky Mountain News. He has an English degree from the University of Washington. He was awarded a fellowship to study internet journalism at the University of Maryland's Knight Center for Specialized Journalism. He was student body president in college. He spends his free time hiking and skiing.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>