Too little water for nuclear power in Colorado; too much of the stuff in neighboring Nebraska

Too little water for nuclear power in Colorado; too much of the stuff in neighboring Nebraska

The biggest reason cited by the Pueblo County commissioners recently when they rejected a rezoning request to accommodate a proposed nuclear power plant was their collective concern about a lack of water to cool the plant.

Colorado’s only foray into nuclear power ended in 1989 when Fort St. Vrain, a gas-cooled reactor implemented because of the state’s lack of water, was decommissioned because it ran inefficiently. Now 14 metric tons of radioactive spent fuel are being stored at the mothballed facility, just about a quarter mile from an Xcel Energy gas-fired power plant.

The Platte River with Fort St. Vrain in the background. Elizabeth Weinstein photo

It’s all in Platteville, along the banks of the South Platte River, which then flows past the small cities of Greeley and Sterling on its way to Nebraska, where a lack of water is the last thing worrying nuclear regulatory officials in that state these days.

Spring flooding along the Missouri River has threatened to swamp two nuclear plants in eastern Nebraska, raising serious concerns locally, regionally and even around the globe.

In a previous interview with the Colorado Independent, Ted Borst, facility manager for the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) where Fort St. Vrain’s spent fuel is stored, said flooding is one of his lowest level concerns.

“Their minds should be at ease,” Borst said of public concerns in Colorado. “The facility is very robust and it’s designed to take a design-basis earthquake, a design-basis tornado. We even have a design-basis flood in there, which there isn’t a whole lot of water around there and we’re kind of sitting above the rivers so it’s kind of hard to see how a flood could happen.”

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s license to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to continue storing the spent fuel at the ISFSI in Platteville is set to expire in November, and the DOE is requesting a 20-year extension for the license.

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.

About the Author

David O. Williams

is an award-winning reporter who has covered energy, environmental and political issues for years. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Denver Post. He's founder of Real Vail
and Real Aspen.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>