Oil and gas lease protests way down in wake of Obama administration reforms

Oil and gas lease protests way down in wake of Obama administration reforms

Sportsmen and conservation groups are singing the praises of a new federal analysis showing protests of proposed oil and gas leases on federal lands are way down in the wake of reforms first implemented by the Interior Department last year.

A new U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) report (pdf) found that only 8 percent of all proposed leases were formally protested by environmental groups so far this year compared to 36 percent over the last six years.

“Before the leasing reforms, the public typically didn’t know what energy companies had planned until the BLM started approving drill permits,” said Kate Zimmerman, senior policy adviser with the National Wildlife Federation, a member of Sportsmen for Responsible Energy Development (SFRED).

“By that time, BLM would say it was too late to consider the impacts to fish and wildlife that would result from drilling. Often, the only way for the public to raise concerns was to protest the issuance of the leases, and that is always an expensive and time-consuming process.”

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar first announced the leasing reforms, which were designed to allow more up-front public input and to curtail the use of “categorical exclusions” for some parcels, early in 2010. At the time he blasted the oil and gas industry for fighting his reforms and the previous administration for allowing the industry so much leeway on environmental issues.

“The difference is that in the prior administration the oil and gas industry essentially were the kings of the world,” Salazar told reporters at the time. “Whatever they wanted to happen essentially happened. The department was essentially a handmaiden of the industry.”

The new reforms were finally finalized in May of 2010 and have been targeted by industry representatives and some Republican lawmakers ever since. In May, just two days after the U.S. Senate rejected a bill that would have ended billions in tax breaks and subsidies for the nation’s top oil and gas companies, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., introduced a bill aimed at “removing barriers to American onshore oil and natural gas production.”

But in March the Interior Department released a study showing up to half of all onshore oil and gas leases on federal lands are not being utilized by the industry. And just last month a new study entitled “Sitting Pretty” (pdf) showed there are 6,573 BLM drilling permits currently on the books in five western states, 571 of them in Colorado.

“We’ve worked long and hard to bring some balance back into the process of energy leasing on public land,” said Brad Powell, energy director for Trout Unlimited, also a SFRED member. “For generations we’ve seen fish and game and the habitat they need take a back seat to the desires of the oil and gas industry, and we’ve had the support of the American public in our efforts to get the BLM to do something about it.”

Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.

Got a tip? Story pitch? Send us an e-mail. Follow The Colorado Independent on Twitter.



About the Author

David O. Williams

is an award-winning reporter who has covered energy, environmental and political issues for years. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Chicago Tribune and Denver Post. He's founder of Real Vail
and Real Aspen.

Leave a Response

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>