Close, but no cigar: Slavery amendment loses
In the end, Amendment T came close, but not close enough.
Much has been written about why voters turned down Amendment T, the measure referred by the Colorado General Assembly to the November ballot that would have struck slavery from the language of the state Constitution.
Critics and voters have said the measure’s wording was confusing, or cited “ballot fatigue” — there were just too many issues for voters to decide on this year.
Here’s another possible reason: Denver voters were by far the strongest supporters of Amendment T, but not enough of them actually voted on the measure to help it pass.
Final unofficial ballot numbers are in from Denver, and Amendment T won by about a two-to-one margin there, with 188,477 “yes” votes and 95,811 “no” votes.
But plenty of voting Denverites — more than the statewide average, in fact — “undervoted,” or didn’t make a choice on Amendment T at all. In Denver, almost 55,000 people who cast ballots didn’t vote either way.
Statewide, based on unofficial election results from the Secretary of State, Amendment T failed by a margin of fewer than 18,000 votes, with 1,285,310 “no” votes and 1,267,578 “yes” votes. In order for the amendment to have gone to an automatic recount, the difference would have had to have been a fraction of that — about 6,426 votes.
Rep. Joe Salazar of Thornton was disappointed when he learned just how close the measure came to passing. But he told The Colorado Independent he isn’t giving up. He said he plans to launch another effort to put the measure on the ballot and work with supporters to change the strategy so that voters will have a better understanding of the measure in the future.
Like this story? Steal it! Feel free to republish it in part or in full, just please give credit to The Colorado Independent and add a link to the original.
The Colorado Media Project is committed to sharing new, inspiring ideas about the future of news that are timely and relevant to our Colorado community. Join us […]Read More
Call Wednesday’s filing deadline the calm-before-the-general-election storm — the first time candidates and campaigns had to show the public their books since the June 26 […]Read More